Ain’t Nothing but a Man

Ain't Nothing but a Man: My Quest to Find the Real John Henry
Ain’t Nothing but a Man: My Quest to Find the Real John Henry by Scott Reynolds Nelson, Marc Aronson

It seems appropriate that I would discover this book years after it was published, when I was looking for something else. It was listed as a biography of John Henry, which it is in part. More quest than biography, as the title suggests. This short volume tells the story of history professor Scott Reynolds Nelson’s detective work, sometimes circuitous, sometimes serendipitous, but always fascinating, leading closer and closer to a true vision of the man behind the legend.

Part of my enjoyment of this book came from the memories it evoked of my own past in graduate school, doing historical research, arguing theories of how something might have been. History, like most other liberal arts fields, is open to speculation and full of people looking for evidence to suggest that their vision of the past is closer to the truth than another scholar’s. For children, and even adults, outside the field this is a rare view. Literal minded youth believe things are one way or another, not both or neither. While historians can say that John Henry both existed and didn’t (which is my reading of this book), children and some adults want to know definitively if he lived or not.

In large part, the beauty of this book is more in the lesson that it teaches of history work and the uncertainty of the past. Children reading this, or listening to this story, have to accept that the pictures uncovered are John Henry, but maybe not the John Henry. That John Henry died during a time period when things ascribed to him happened, but that it is not necessarily certain that he was involved.

When I book talked this book, I asked how many kids knew who John Henry was, and of those who did, who thought he was a real person. The kids were split, some were sure he was real and some were sure he wasn’t, but what they lacked is what this book demonstrates, the ability to see him as both.

I think that this is the beauty of speculative non fiction. If done right, it prompts children to think, to engage in more then one truth, to see that things are not static, even in the past, and that they have the ability to think and determine what is true once they learn to look at the data they are presented with.

When I do library tours, I ask the kids what the difference between non-fiction and fiction is, and usually someone shouts out “one is true and the other false.” As we walk to the beginning of the non-fiction stacks, I pull out books on Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster, and I ask them if they think these creatures are real. Through our discussion on these tours I try to encourage children to look at the non-fiction as an area where the books are organized by subject, and tell them that they, as readers, have the responsibility to decide for themselves as they read the books here if they think they are true.

Critical thinking is the most useful skill anyone can have, and through reading, discussing, and thinking about books like Ain’t Nothing but a Man I believe children can begin to develop this skill.

This non-fiction Monday post is, in part, my response to the controversy over Marc Aaronson’s debate over speculation in children’s nonfiction.


4 responses to “Ain’t Nothing but a Man

  1. Pingback: Nonfiction Monday: We Want You to Know: Kids Talk About Bullying « Chapter Book of the Day

  2. I, too really enjoyed this book and have book talked this to education students (teacher preparation) as a great example of historical research and how to make history come alive. Fascinating read.

  3. lessalibrarian

    I think the fact that you point out “subjects” as opposed to straight facts and not-facts in the “non-fiction” area is really important and something I know that I don’t point out during school visits. I think especially in the religion area this concept might be important for the kids to understand, since some of them conflict in ways and they may be taught that one religion is right and one wrong in the home.
    Although, I do have to note that I’m married to someone who loves cryptozoology and I haven’t decided yet whether or not he thinks they’re fact or fiction 🙂

  4. Nice post! Thanks for weighing in on the speculative nonfiction debate. We should always be teaching (and practicing) critical thinking, and your examples are a great way to start. Taking nonfiction vs. fiction beyond truth vs. make-believe by introducing the “organized by subject” concept and by pointing out the various subjects in the nonfiction section that are not entirely settled is a brilliant idea–and a great teachable moment to remember! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s